Blog Post

Venture capital: a new breath of life for European entrepreneurship?

Whether the dynamism of European venture capital of the past two years can be sustained and kick start a credible alternative to bank finance in the European Union remains to be seen.

By: and Date: February 10, 2022 Topic: Banking and capital markets

Worldwide, private equity investment grew by approximately 50% between 2019 and 2021 (Figure 1). Venture capital, in particular, has grown fastest, by a factor of more than three in value terms. In the United States and the European Union, venture capital grew by a factor of about two from 2020 to 2021 (Figure 2). Equity increased steadier and at a much lower rate.

Both equity investments and VC involve an ownership claim but typically private equity firms take over fairly mature firms and claim majority ownership. VCs typically acquire less than half of a company’s shares and invest in smaller, younger companies with high future potential. This allows them to spread the risk they take across more projects.

The picture in the US and the EU is broadly similar. In both markets, VC activity increased by a factor of approximately three between 2019 and 2021, with much of the increase taking place in 2021.

Despite strong increases, VC activity remains a very small part of the total private equity market. Towards the end of 2021, the total value of deals involving VC represented about 10% of the total private equity market in the EU and about 3% in the US. Nevertheless, the total value of deals involving VC worldwide increased to $45 billion in mid-2021, largely driven by an almost twofold increase in the average value of those deals.

Using VC industry data1, figure 3A shows that there has been a rapid increase in VC investment around the world in 2021. Figure 3B illustrates how staggering this increase has been in certain countries: in the major European economies (Italy, France, Poland, Germany and Spain), VC funding has increased by a factor of 2 to 2.5 relative to 2019 levels. In Cyprus and in Malta, VC funding has increased by a factor of 16 and 30, respectively! Such increases are incredible by any standards.

1Data from Figures 1 and 2 reports total value of deals in which VC funds are involved, which can therefore include investments from other types of funds. Figures 3A and 3B use industry-level data so as to report exclusively VC investments.

Tables 1 and 2 show that VC funding is local. European VCs were involved in financing approximately 80% of companies in the EU, with US VCs as the second source. Similarly, US VCs were involved in more than 90% of domestic VC deals. Domestic VC activity was much higher (almost by a factor of five) in the US (4940 US vs 1079 EU companies) in 2021, consistent with US capital markets being more developed. The number of deals in the US and the EU was however very comparable (460 vs 488).

Digital companies are the main targets of US VC when investing in the EU, regularly accounting for more than half of all investment (Figure 4). It is notable that American investment in European digital firms increased more than in companies from other sectors in 2021.

Over the past three years, the number of cross-border deals involving EU VCs and EU targets has increased about twofold (see Figure 5). This is more or less in line with the general increase in number of VC deals and is encouraging evidence of the development of capital markets in the EU.

What explains this rapid increase?

Helped by very supportive fiscal and monetary policies across the world at the start of the pandemic, and by a surge in growth (particularly in tech companies), stock markets globally had a very good year in 2021. In the US, the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average indices both reached all-time highs.

VCs exploited the favourable stock market conditions in 2021 to exit from their investments through public offerings. A report from Ernst & Young describes how the number of new initial public offerings (IPOs) worldwide in 2021 increased 64% in one year, with Europe being one of the regions breaking records.

The large numbers of exits in the past year has led to a large supply of capital. Coupled with low interest rates, investors are still seeking opportunities, funnelling funds into private companies and VC funds. And with exits still increasing, there is enough interest and ability to fund new firms.

It is not just the demand for investment that has increased. The pandemic has caused disruption to working methods. Indeed, the ability to work remotely has allowed start-up teams to be dispersed and therefore be more international. Analysts expect companies that are capable of riding the wave of innovation to increase in scale, valuation and importance. Clearly, more potentially interesting firms are looking for financing.

As the numbers indicate, the European VC scene is becoming larger, more active and more successful. In a recent conference on the future of venture capital in Europe, a number of major investment areas were identified across northern Europe in gaming, clean technology, B2B software, digital health and big data. A combination of VC investors, start-ups, universities and research centres is attracting both investors and talent, creating innovation ecosystems. It is not expected that one major hub will emerge in Europe to rival, say, Silicon Valley, but a more dispersed ecosystem across different parts of Europe should be expected.

But in the EU, another factor has played a decisive role: government support in the form of financing programmes that have eased access to equity funding for start-ups. As Europe lacks the large pools of capital available in the US through university endowments and non-profit foundations, EU government financing has been an important supplement to pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and family office capital (instrument that deals with family wealth). Alongside specific country initiatives, the European Investment Fund (and sub-initiatives like the European Angels Fund) have provided investment funds and technical assistance. More recently, the European Innovation Council launched an ‘Accelerator’ aimed at early-stage emerging technology. Alongside equity funds, this instrument is also meant to provide advisers. Early results indicate that private investors are monitoring where the fund is investing.

But this new dynamism also comes with risks. With venture capitalists competing more intensely to seal deals in record time, entrepreneurs find themselves with increased bargaining power. Reports suggest that as a result, VC funds decide on deals with less information on start-ups and viability of investment. Sceptics argue that this ‘competition to give away money’ (or “capital foie gras”, as some more graphically put it) will mainly advantage men, while others believe that it will result in misallocation of funds towards businesses with no chance of survival. While it is too early to assess the fallout from this exceptional VC environment, such risks further highlight the importance of monitoring the development of capital markets in Europe.

As the numbers in Figure 3 show, capital markets in the EU have had a very active two years but remain small in comparison to the US. It remains to be seen how successful VCs are in sustaining the dynamism observed in 2021, and whether this dynamism will persist and help kick start a credible alternative to bank finance in the EU.


Recommended citation:

Demertzis, M. and L. Guetta-Jeanrenaud (2022) ‘Europe’s venture capital boom: a new breath of life for entrepreneurship?’ Bruegel Blog, 10 February

Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Green public investment after COVID-19

How can the public sector meet the climate funding needs of the EU?

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Elena Flores, Louise Skouby and Laurent Zylberberg Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: July 5, 2022
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

BRI 2.0: How has the pandemic influenced China’s landmark Belt and Road Initiative?

China's Belt and Road Initiative is undergoing a transformation after two years of pandemic. How is it changing and what are the consequences for Europe.

Speakers: Alessia Amighini, Eyck Freymann, Alicia García-Herrero and Zhang Xiaotong Topic: Global economy and trade Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: June 23, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Policy Contribution

COVID-19 and the shift to remote work

The post-pandemic new normal is sure to differ both from the pre-pandemic normal and from current arrangements. Hybrid arrangements in which part of the week is spent at the office, and part at home, are likely to become the norm.

By: J. Scott Marcus Topic: Digital economy and innovation Date: June 16, 2022
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 25, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author



The cost of China's dynamic zero-COVID policy

What does zero-COVID mean for both China and the global economy?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 11, 2022
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

From viruses to wars: recent disruptions to global trade and value chains

How have events in recent years impacted global trade and value chains and how can we strengthen these against future disruptions?

Speakers: Dalia Marin, Adil Mohommad and André Sapir Topic: Global economy and trade Date: April 27, 2022
Read article More by this author

Blog Post

Owning up to sustainability risks: the EU should champion international standards

To keep European Union capital markets open and integrated, new international standards should be reflected in future European law and accounting practice to provide further incentives for a reallocation of capital, reflecting in particular climate risks.

By: Alexander Lehmann Topic: Banking and capital markets, Green economy Date: April 26, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author


China’s Covid policy to be year’s largest economic shock

Beijing’s ‘dynamic zero-Covid’ policy could devastate the domestic economy, but the effects will also be felt globally.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global economy and trade Date: April 26, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Working Paper

The low productivity of European firms: how can policies enhance the allocation of resources?

A summary of the most important policy lessons from research undertaken in the MICROPROD project work package 4, related to the allocation of the factors of production, with a special focus on the weak dynamism of European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

By: Grégory Claeys, Marie Le Mouel and Giovanni Sgaravatti Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 25, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Working Paper

Knowledge flows and global value chains

Trade and industrial policy can support productivity growth through global value chains by providing the right legal environment that supports the formation of longterm business relationships.

By: Marta Bisztray and Niclas Poitiers Topic: Global economy and trade Date: April 13, 2022
Read article More on this topic

Blog Post

Is the private sector retreating in China? Not among its largest companies

Though private ownership does not free companies from the pervasive influence of the Communist Party, China’s private and state sectors are not equivalent; China’s largest firms are growing faster than their state-owned counterparts.

By: Tianlei Huang and Nicolas Véron Topic: Global economy and trade Date: April 5, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Working Paper

The private sector advances in China: The evolving ownership structures of the largest companies in the Xi Jinping era

This paper documents recent structural changes in China’s corporate landscape, based on company level data, providing a complementary perspective to that of official Chinese statistics.

By: Tianlei Huang and Nicolas Véron Topic: Global economy and trade Date: April 5, 2022
Load more posts